28
Dec

UNIFIED SCIENCE & the ABSTRACTION of the UNIVERSAL “INDIVIDUAL to the COLLECTIVE” STRUCTURING to a UNIFIED FIELD of EMERGENT: TIME, MEANING & EVERYTHING ELSE — UNIVERSAL INFORMATION PROGRESSING — PURELY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH on the ORIGINS of our CELESTIAL & EPHEMERAL SYMBOLOGY, MYTHOLOGY, ASTROLOGY, RELIGION, ETYMOLOGY & on LINGUISTICS — SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHING of our COLLECTIVE

INDIVIDUAL of the COLLECTIVE as the FIRST derived STRUCTURING of the known UNIVERSE — derision of the UNIVERSAL INFORMATION PROGRESSING implicating the SAMENESS of TIME, MEANING & of ALL other EMERGENCIES — DEFINITION of UNDERSTANDING — INDIVIDUALISM & PROGRESSING of the INDIVIDUAL — SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH on the ORIGINS of ASTROLOGY, SYMBOLS, LINGUISTICS & more

Here I’ll be discussing this logic I accidentally seemingly derived as a consequence of the inclusion of our universal (naturally occurring) “individual of the collective” predisposition in combination with a plethora of other metaphysical, religious, mythological, ephemeral or celestial symbolics (or better said, pieces of our collective unconscious). And this text has a goal of describing this structure, mainly because such to me seemingly appeared as a unique something, that further seems to be applicable in derision of a real-life applicable logic for conduction of any structural analysis or structuring or any possible formation process. Furthermore, as I didn’t found nor stumbled upon any similar structuring or logic anywhere else, I published this paper, to share and to speak of these ideas and thoughts.

And, in regards to any structuring of the universal information with a such imposed level of abstraction in derision of structuring (logic), its presenting may certainly appear as a quite complex process, or as something quite dense, and as such, as a bit hard to follow. It is furthermore, certainly not-for-everyone’s understanding, nor for the easy understanding of it; though that seems to be my ultimate goal and that further, also, seemingly appears to be a quite inevitable goal of emerging or development of all & any LOGIC (or STRUCTURING) of what’s UNIVERSAL.

Luckily, there will probably be some of you which will understand this structure I hereby abstracted, and by doing so be acknowledging my efforts & time which I`ve invested in putting all of this together (to appear as something coherent ~enough). Furthermore as that’s pretty much all I ever had in mind & wanted regarding this & any other abstraction I was publicly speaking of (and maybe also in regards to the abstraction of my whole life up to now, as well), and as such, this text certainly may seem structured “a bit” chaotic and often heavy, or intense (similarly to how I naturally appear) but, I must declare to all of you that this text was not written to either appear (in any form), or to seem & sound in totality, and in any manner as a totally professional, fully scientific research, or to be presenting me as some professional scientist, nor this structuring of which I wrote of, in any form would really require such level of design, semantics, perfect spelling and grammar since it much rather has as the main goal feature of reaching close to being UNIVERSAL, much rather unifying & connecting (or seeing the big picture of it all); but with certainly some note or a sense of urgency in publishing & sharing some of my conclusions and actual discoveries. In this particular text, I wrote solely of these conclusions & of some discoveries I personally derived that (to me) seemed as nowhere seen, or as ideas which appear to be having a just enough specificity or uniqueness, or which seemed as somewhat having just enough of real-life applicability, or seeming as truthful enough but, ultimately not so tragic, and with some good spirit or hope behind. Therefore, some unique thoughts that are containing all specifications or features which are making appear as something really ~important for me to write & to speak about & share with you.

Chapter 1 — UNIVERSAL UNDERSTANDING & the STRUCTURE of the UNIFIED SCIENCE — SAMENESS of TIME, MEANING & of ALL EMERGENT FORMS

PRE-INTRODUCTION — INDIVIDUALISM and its factual RESULTS in a PROGRESSION of the INDIVIDUAL to a size of the COLLECTIVE

It appears as if when we are doing a progression of any INDIVIDUAL to fit a SIZE or to act in the form or as any INSTITUTION or better said as the COLLECTIVE of an any kind (and have the same number of interactions as these seemingly appear to have), as such, actually almost always seems to be showcasing results that are rather and much more often pointing out that an INDIVIDUAL factually CAN NOT and should NOT be trying to BECOME or to ACT as an INSTITUTION, mainly because the results of such an action seems to be taking several, rather quite predictable possible OUTCOMES. These seem to be: either a BURNOUT of that particular INDIVIDUAL, or it’s further PROGRESSION, ultimately up to its natural limitations, and seemingly, in the most exampled cases, actually not far further away from these (natural) limitations. These limitations factually appear to influence the formation of the nature-given either a BULLY or a TYRANT (as a male) or, a PROSTITUTE or a PROMISCUOUS FEMININE (as a female); Out of which all these three previously mentioned, in our current day system of INDIVIDUALISM and/or CAPITALISM, seemingly appear to be quite of a Suficitiary specificities, seen forming nowadays, globally everywhere.

Further on, we COLLECTIVELY do seem to act as if we’d at some point agreed on a proposition that an INDIVIDUAL can functionally ACT or to actually BECOME an INSTITUTION (of an any kind). That furthermore actually seems to be the proposition that factually appears of being both physically, psychologically & sociologically an IMPOSSIBLE one.

As the real-life data seems to be pointing that any INDIVIDUAL, when PROGRESSED (in size or better-said in numbers of interactions) rather, appears as being LIMITED by its own NATURALLY PRESENT LIMITS, and as such seems drastically more often structuring itself into a structure factually seemingly not transcending far further from its particular NATURALLY PRESENT LIMITS, visually well showcased in these two examples of the NATURALLY occurred, PROGRESSED INDIVIDUALS, that seemingly appear acting as INSTITUTIONS (and so mainly because of their numbers of interactions, of course, with other individuals):

– A BULLY — which is a progressed Male

Father, Tribe Head, Autocrat, Mafia, Steroid Muscles, Godfather, Jay-Z

– A PROSTITUTE — which is a progressed Female

Mother, Tribe Care Taker, Shelter, Nymph, Promiscuous, Escort, Rihanna

It seems that without some logically imposed limit, there’s only one other limit that we could hit and that one is the limit of the real-life data or better said THE UNIVERSAL LIMIT, and, we COLLECTIVELY do seemingly appear to be hitting intensely that one and for a while now in regards to a lot of aspects of what`s an INDIVIDUAL and of what it should be. The process of DIFFERENTIATION between INDIVIDUALS as such of course appears as a PROGRESSION of a particular sort, but, as the intensity of a such, for a while now seems as quite measurably growing, feels as almost exponentially, if I may add so, since the first, but especially after the second world war, I’d like to also digress a bit to analyse and debate of these developments further in this text, during which, instead of presenting to all of you my own, personally derived facts (probably confirming my abstractions), I’d much rather structure some of your own facts, or better said some of our collective knowledge and data that hopefully both you and I (and others) should also know or be familiar with… And therefore, I would in some sense, manipulate with our COLLECTIVELY SHARED DATA, and so, with clear goals of being both polite and of trying to be UNIVERSAL (and as much as I possibly could).

  • And these are just two examples of the usage & the applicability of our Myths or Archetypal structures (progressing ultimately to our Religious or Metaphysical and Astro-Psychological abstracts) that are basically just Universal representations and the symbols that are seemingly functional in representing some of the Universal (naturally occurring) phenomenon or of, frankly said, our never-currently-individually-chosen, but also, always-previously-collectively-shared experiences or memories. And these are just two of the examples of the countless number of existing symbols, seemingly solely statistically confirmed and researchable, which are facts further implicating the existing possibility (and the existing potential of a such) of the purely scientific researching of Mythological, Metaphysical, Religious & ultimately, ASTROLOGICAL bits of knowledge, all seemingly emergent from a single point explained in the chapter below.

Chapter 2 — * INTRODUCTION to the UNIVERSAL PROGRESSING & UNIFIED SCIENCE STRUCTURE:

Introduction to a structurisation of the unified science(s) and this universal structural analysis — Structuring logic (accidentally) derived (by myself apparently) consequentially, as a result of the comparison of the outcome of any information, universally, and therefore, dually progressed, researching this (built-in or naturally occurring) universality (and the natural structuring) obviously structuring itself from this Individual of the Collective predisposition clearly resulting in structuring & all our derived (meanings), or better said, differings of the end results of all universally progressed information. Progressing the universal information of an any sort and, as such, any: image, gesture, meaning, word, symbol, formation, system, group, structure, process, function, action etc; meaning that’s being progressed universally, and as such as BOTH as an INDIVIDUAL and as the part of a COLLECTIVE (group, species, or even better said, the LIFE, itself).

* This INDIVIDUAL of the COLLECTIVE predisposition seems as (non-debated but very) CRUCIAL first step, REQUIRED for the EMERGENCE or STRUCTURING of ANY possible STRUCTURE or FORMATION.

* Also, as LOGIC appears to be dictating that any potentially conducted PROGRESSING of the UNIVERSAL INFORMATION, REQUIRES INCLUSION of this DUALITY in any conducted PROGRESSING, that seems to be implicating that the derival of all FORMS and of any EMERGED STRUCTURE or (MEANING) FORMATION, seems to be EMERGENT in PROGRESSING of the universal INFORMATION, UNIVERSALLY, and as such, THROUGH BOTH of what we & other naturally occurring always are.

* So, PROGRESSING, BOTH as an INDIVIDUAL and, as the part of a COLLECTIVE, and as such, factually conducting of such always DUALLY or in DUALITY, and as a:

1. TIME-LIMITED SYSTEM (of an INDIVIDUAL) °

2. NON-TIME-LIMITED SYSTEM (as the COLLECTIVE) ~

* Which implies that BOTH TIME & MEANING, EMERGE as the SAME FORMATION or STRUCTURING…?

* Therefore ALL STRUCTURES seem to be EMERGENT from APPROXIMATING or DIFFERENTIATION of the OUTCOME (of the end results) of any UNIVERSALLY PROGRESSED INFORMATION…?

* UNIVERSALLY PROGRESSED INFORMATION is hereby any UNIVERSAL INFORMATION, PROGRESSED UNIVERSALLY and as such DUALLY, both as an INDIVIDUAL and as the part of a COLLECTIVE…?

I am certainly not the first one to think of this, as many others had thoughts about this, though, still very different than mine are though (~1792 a Russian Novelist, ~1930 C.G. Yung & many others after him)… But, these differ and I did connect quite further on, structuring what seemingly appears to be the STRUCTURE of the UNIFIED SCIENCE or the STRUCTURING (LOGIC), seeming exceptionally APPLICABLE to a lot of stuff.

Chapter 3 — UNIVERSAL STRUCTURES & UNIFIED SCIENCE — UNIFIED FIELD THEORY

At this 2019, it seems as if it’s more than a proper time to take a different approach & to unify our logic that is of course and as such, used in any potentially conducted researching of our naturally occurring UNIVERSE, and in this text I`ll try to example of how to do so, utilising a very first, oldest but nevertheless, quite particular, UNIVERSAL logic which tries with inter-connecting of our current categorisation of the naturally present data seemingly appearing as not-inter-connected or unified to any unified system (connecting it all); Limited by our (current day) rather INDIVIDUAL logic & the limits of the INDIVIDUALS, themselves, so: Astronomy, Philosophy, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Psychology, Sociology, Mythology, Linguistics, Etymology, Religious, Ethnology, Symbology… become UNIFIED, under one field of SCIENCE; Under which, our operation of thought and derived presumptions, abstracts, logic or any information structuring stops being limited by any means to our own limits but, to the limits of what we are exploring, which is in this case, The Universe, itself.

So, HOW DO WE UNDERSTAND OUR UNIVERSE?

No, scratch that because more than half of the people can’t really define WHAT THE UNDERSTANDING ACTUALLY IS, so yeah, we must start from there now.

Chapter 4 — Definition of Understanding

UNDERSTANDING IS when we (as systems (like me and you now)) guide our own probability calculation to correlate to the other systems real-life data that approximated its probability calculation, while not limiting our probability calculation to both our own & the other systems probability calculation limits reached up to that moment, and as these limits further appear as neither the actual universal limits of your individual probability calculation, nor the actual universal limits of your both probability calculations, but the limits which seem to be existing solely within the currently applied logic, furthermore confirmable only through data.

Individualism VS Collectivism

WE ARE most certainly appearing as the

We do seem to be quite a particular system of systems, containing a variety of other, smaller systems, and further on, smaller systems that are probably containing a variety of other even smaller and smaller, well, SYSTEMS.

And our term DISCOVERY could probably be defined as: “Our moment of UNDERSTANDING of the (real-life applicable) LOGIC or STRUCTURING method used for the arranging of some parts of the naturally occurring data, or even better said, of the UNIVERSAL INFORMATION.”

And therefore, since our current day scientific discoveries are much more often made through our INDIVIDUAL UNDERSTANDING of the various pieces of our universal information, it seems rather logical (to me at least at this point) that, in order to get able to understand of anything that’s MORE COMPLEX (and above us, and there, in COSMOS, all around us), we seemingly need to be able to comprehend our own level first (and in its totality) which factually, logically does requires us to reach to our COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING of many areas that we are EXPLORING.

Anyhow, this particular and (to me) certainly appearing as quite a non-debated UNIVERSAL DUALITY of (seemingly ANY LIVING) ONESELF seems to be set by this “INDIVIDUAL of the COLLECTIVE” predisposition which seems factually REQUIRED for the EMERGENCE of any possible FORMATION, MEANING, UNDERSTANDING, SYMBOL, IMAGE and, well, ultimately of EVERYTHING. Furthermore in this text, I’ll try to visually example, that this DUALITY seems to be clearly resulting in DIFFERING or ALTERATION shown between any UNIVERSALLY (read DUALLY) processed INFORMATION, which seems to be implicating that the INCLUSION of this DIFFERING or ALTERNATION would seems to be therefore, REQUIRED for any of our actual explorations of our UNIVERSE & responsible for our reaching of the actual UNIVERSAL LIMITS of, well, pretty much ANYTHING EXPLORED; which seems to be implicating the existence of the UNIVERSAL STRUCTURING LOGIC, seemingly responsible for our necessity of the inclusion of BOTH of the approaches in EXPLORATION or RESEARCHING (of ANYTHING).

Further on, if something appears to be more complex than we INDIVIDUALLY seem to be (such as our COLLECTIVES, for example, most CERTAINLY ARE), we seem to be factually forced by nature to much rather utilise our COLLECTIVELY DERIVED and, therefore, our COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING of any logic, much rather than our INDIVIDUAL UNDERSTANDING of such, and so, mainly because it seems that other way simply is either not natural or more often seems as non-real-life existent one. Furthermore, we seem to be hitting some naturally present limits in regards to a lot of what INDIVIDUAL is and should be in charge of, such as the subject of the organisation of our COLLECTIVES seemingly appears to be. Our structural issues are apparently much more often started by the INDIVIDUALLY imposed limits or by our INDIVIDUAL limitations usually started from our INDIVIDUAL UNDERSTANDING of any matter that appears to be seemingly MORE COMPLEX than an INDIVIDUAL seems to be (such as our COLLECTIVES are and such as levels ABOVE our BIOSPHERE & all of us seemingly appear to be).

  • Another again non-debated, but nevertheless, a quite factual conclusion is that we are still INCAPABLE of understanding (and therefore of DISCOVERING) of anything of what’s laying further & BEYOND OUR BIOSPHERE (and up there in space), and hereby (in case you didn’t know so) I just stated the FACT that: WE ARE UNABLE TO TRAVEL ABOVE THE LOW EARTH ORBIT.

Chapter 5—UNIVERSAL DUALITY of ONESELF & the RETURN of the METAPHYSICAL STRUCTURES

INDIVIDUAL life to death “exposition” and “thoughts” are a “finite” systems and as such, their interaction seems to be limited to either similar systems or pretty much to an any other of less complex systems and, some common sense seems to be indicating that in our biosphere as individual human beings, we interact with, either other individuals, or with a variety of other of what seemingly appears to be LESS COMPLEX than we are (Animals, Plants etc).

A LESS COMPLEX SYSTEM than you is “a probability calculation system which is to a lesser extent aligned to the real-life-data of the universe than your own system”; and by this, I could put all your animals, plants & other less or lesser complex systems or systems with even more limited times or the (real-life) data processing.

COLLECTIVELY (either as “the life” and “the species”) we seem to not have any issue in the “TRANSCENDING” of our individual TIME frames. On the other hand, nowadays, we do seem to have a problem in our logic (doing the arranging of the data) and furthermore this particular individual to the collective thing seems nowadays as actually fully non-understood part of us, that’s further resulting with the creation of a particular LOGIC DISCREPANCY, of which the most of you probably never thought of, any deeper level than your own; mainly because, as INDIVIDUALS, both of us last for some time, or have a particular exposition or a time discrepancy, during which we are processing, well, our real-life (universal) data; which further directly implicates that our individual time for processing anything is limited and further on, that when an INDIVIDUAL dies one particularity occurs, which is that our COLLECTIVE actually STORES all of what that INDIVIDUAL was, and so, all his unique achievements or universally said, probably all his achieved complexities, all of what he discovered, did, said, liked & more… So, as individuals can NOT naturally transcend their time limits, it should be UNDERSTOOD further that our collectives naturally do so, and here, important information seems to be that if the collective (say species) dies out, that, is an EXTINCTION, which further, judged by any logic derived from our real-life data, appears of being a such an immensely different event than any INDIVIDUAL DEATH itself; mainly because it seems that upon such an event, IMMENSELY MORE ENERGY becomes either RELEASED or STORED in some form…

Wait, isn`t that actually, HOW ALL our current day FUELS ARE being CREATED!?

Fossil fuel & oils release 10 times more energy than say, burnt wood or burnt alcohol. All 4 of these previously mentioned were being made through some timed systematic death of a sort. That pretty much seems to be nicely aligned to what old Philosophy, Metaphysics, Alchemy tried declaring.

Digging a bit deeper, I think I`ve DISCOVERED something REALLY weird going on in here!

Chapter 6 — * INDIVIDUAL of the COLLECTIVE & the LOGIC DISCREPANCY the most of you (probably) earlier never thought of:

Let’s use our statistics & try to give some UNIVERSAL DEFINITION to the word SUCCESS (in the most generalised/universal way possible):

A probability calculation method applied to the real-life data which got to be better aligned to the real-life data or to the Universe (all around it) than of *all others (*Losers)…?

So, let`s now try to define the same word both as an Individual (Person) and as the Collective (Group/Institution/Species/Life)…?

For an INDIVIDUAL: SUCCESS — Because of the builtin EXPOSITION or a LIMITED TIME DISCREPANCY and as such, as a TIME-LIMITED-SYSTEM, such would seem to be to GET SOME EASIER TIME SPENT (obtaining fewer losses or smoother in progressing of the universal) than all other involved parties (*losers in this case)…?

– achieving HAPPINESS –

For the COLLECTIVE: SUCCESS — Because such appears being a NON-TIME-LIMITED system SUCCESS then appears to be to JUST SURVIVE/NOT DIE out or to NOT BE EXTINCT…!?

– achieving IMMORTALITY –

For THESE “SYSTEMS”, in this particular case, factually seem to be appearing as DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED SYSTEMS…!?

Diametrically Opposed Systems?

This “discovery” seemed to me as more than a quite an important “thing” I`ve stumbled upon while brainstorming and further on, since I didn’t seem to find anything both online or anywhere else I searched regarding this particular matter, or this particular logic issue, I just felt like I`m going crazy again, and for no other reason than for this all…?

If you ever heard of anyone speaking of this matter, please leave the link or a comment below, because it seems as if the only coherently connected resources I`ve found about this particular matter are actually written by myself!????????

Chapter 7 — INDIVIDUAL LIMITS, COLLECTIVE LIMITS and the UNIVERSAL LIMITS — UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN SYSTEMS of DIFFERENT COMPLEXITIES

It seems as if we should, with some sense of urgency be trying to find some logic that appears more aligned to the universally occurring data (or to the UNIVERSAL LIMITS), that may further be guiding our probability calculators (or the BRAINS) to a better or a more firm alignment with what is naturally occurring all around us (in our UNIVERSE), of course, while still remaining scientific & objective pretty much all the way through. Reason for doing so (momentarily) appears to be and I`d use a sentence that NOAM CHOMSKY often says: “the actual further SURVIVAL of ORGANISED LIFE ON EARTH”. And that mainly because in some sense it seems as if a drastically smaller percentage of our INDIVIDUALS seem to be defacto resulting this DEGRADATION of our COLLECTIVE (even consciously & quite intentionally lowering occurrence of UNDERSTANDING between various INDIVIDUALS) & such, if progressed a bit seems to be resulting in further gaps or in amplification of occurring differences, seemingly appearing to be expressed everywhere & in all aspects of life, since, even regarding the crucial aspects of life like CLIMATE CHANGE appears of being, our (“non-existent”) UNIFIED STRUCTURING seems rather unable of STRUCTURING any type of the functional COLLECTIVE that appears as non-cancerous or that in its core doesn’t follow a single INDIVIDUAL that is quite often, and as such, factually solely responsible for the implementation of this currently seen structuring limitations and this CANCER-CELL-LOGIC of GROWTH, by any means.

Further on, judging from our current day globally manifested issues expressed all over our structures or systems, our social, political & neuro-psychological and throughout our COLLECTIVE, we seem as quite limited in UNDERSTANDING of OUR OWN SYSTEM, and to me, that seems to be further implicating the existence of some imposed limit or a logic disability, seemingly functionally disabling us in our UNDERSTANDING of any SYSTEM appearing to be MORE COMPLEX than OUR INDIVIDUAL SYSTEM IS or universally said than WE INDIVIDUALLY ARE.

But, since this seems to be set to even lower complexity than the complexity of our system seems to be, and to the level of complexity of our individuals, seemingly factually resulting with quite visibly shown structural issues (of the collective). Furthermore as our currently applied logic seems to be set into a quite particular logic discrepancy of a sort, and to our individuals which more often seem to be actively trying to rule the (entire) collective; A particular development which should by any real-life applicable logic, as a result, have a further destruction of such. As naturally occurred we are, as such, in a quite proper sense of it, UNIVERSAL. TO UNIVERSALLY UNDERSTAND (in its totality) of what is OUR OWN LEVEL, WE are REQUIRED to acknowledge that IN our BIOSPHERE, WE seem to be able to INTERACT with EITHER SIMILAR or with a variety of other SYSTEMS of the SAME COMPLEXITY (as we are), and with pretty much all other, LESS-COMPLEX SYSTEMS (than we seemingly are, such as our animals, plants etc).

So, some common sense and some naturally occurring logic seems to be indicating that in order to scientifically research what’s ABOVE our own BIOSPHERE, WE ARE REQUIRED to GO BEYOND OUR INDIVIDUAL LIMITATIONS and to UNDERSTAND, OPTIMISE and UTILISE our COLLECTIVE systems (which seems to be the moment that’s going to occur, in every case or scenario I can currently think of).

A parallel line could be drawn & further explained by this common-sense & logic raising from an example in which we are assigned with a quest of building a skyscraper. A structure which is seemingly more complex than we individually seem to be, exampling the process that seems to point out the natural or nature ruling over all & inflicting us with this requirement of conducting so or of building the actual skyscraper through the utilisation of our COLLECTIVE much, much rather than doing so as an INDIVIDUAL or individually. Mainly because, it seems highly unlikely that INDIVIDUALLY you could be able to build it on your own, either without the knowledge or the skills which other individuals have had perfected & SHARED and further without their coordinated (read SHARED) power & a plethora of other, COLLECTIVELY DERIVED aspects.

IMPORTANT: It seems that these collective systems are, judged from all existing real-life data and derived logic, only existing non-time-limited systems we have. Those parts (of us, and of all of life) seem to be the only “transcendental” parts we seem to possess that are allowing the surpassing of our individual time frames, but also, as naturally occurred, these simply must be just another part of what’s still making us remaining under what’s UNIVERSAL actually.

Our collective systemsobviously appear to be responsible for the ability of any form of life to surpass its INDIVIDUAL logic & structuring LIMITS, so it appears that WE (as either our species or as the life) practically seem to possess a real option to explore whatever lays BEYOND of our BIOSPHERE & of our INDIVIDUAL TIME frames, ultimately up in SPACE or COSMOS, which we are so desperately trying to reach & explore by the forced (paid) utilisation of the physical world solely, nowadays actually amplifying the results of the issues like climate change is.

Don’t take me wrong here, I am not a climate change fanatic or anything like that, but I am certainly not a climate change denier either, and so mainly because of my personal experience. Very recently I went for swimming on the coast of Sweden (nearby Malme) that by all common-sense & logic simply shall be very, very cold, and in the lack of better words, simply must be intensely cold, but, it wasn’t cold at all… at all.

Chapter 8 — CURRENT SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHING, UNIVERSAL RESEARCHING & DERISION of the STRUCTURE of the UNIFIED SCIENCE

It appears that SCIENCES in today’s form, are almost always being developed at the INDIVIDUAL LEVELS, since they almost always carry on further into DISSECTING of the UNIVERSAL data and in exploring the SHORTER TIME DISCREPANCIES or smaller chunks (or of lower complexities than ourselves are) of the universal data; so it`s even better to be said & defined that all these usually do a ZOOM IN thing, into SMALLER & further SMALLER section or the PART of the UNIVERSAL DATA. Making our sciences further clustered into smaller and certainly smaller pieces, not-unified-at-all and with a more & more division between these chunks of the data of our UNIVERSE, and I hope we all can agree that that’s exactly, what’s going on with this matter, for more than a while now…

It seems we have this naturally existing logically derived indication that all our individual sciences & all our individually derived conclusions & scientific researching of any matter, tends to be doing a further zoom in thing, zooming into everything that it seems to be exploring and we may try to understand & to deduct a bit deeper of why such indication seems to occur and also, to acknowledge that such was a quite of a beneficial standpoint in our battle against any organism, seemingly appearing as less complex (than we are), factually ensuring our war against many beasts & animals but also with many illnesses, bacterias, viruses & other micro-organisms.

Also, it appears that because of our individuals & their individual approaches to a variety of momentarily particularly problematic areas, we had succeeded and discovered on how to put many other smaller and further smaller systems to our own control (our animals, plants, cells, molecules, atoms, etc) and on how to make our tools & of so much more… but it now seems we shall also try to conduct the:

UNIFICATION of our current day CHUNKS of DATA into a UNIFIED LOGIC of a HIGHER COMPLEXITY

To Unite the Data into a higher Logic.

In our Biosphere, all our animals, plants, and eventually, our micro world, bacterias, viruses, molecules, atoms, electrons, protons, leptons, quarks or whatever the last categorisation is named, is naturally just the part of what`s less complex than us! And the data indicated that we can`t really use that approach for what seems to be more complex than us.

I’LL TRY TO VISUALLY EXPLAIN HOW I SEE THIS:

UP ˄ UPWARDS or LONGER TIME DISCREPANCIES >

COLLECTIVE or COLLECTIVELY DERIVED

< TIMELESS

< ZOOMING OUT < SHARED< UNITY < WE MADE < WE ACHIEVED < COLLECTIVELY ACHIEVED < BOOKS < LANGUAGES < SYMBOLS < MYTHS < SHARED KNOWLEDGE < SPECIES DIFFERING < DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN REFLEXES < COLLECTIVE UNCONSCIOUS < UNDERSTANDING OF SHARED & OF THE SIMILAR< GESTURES < MALE TO FEMALE SEX

<TRANSCEDENTAL

<MACRO ◎ BIOSPHERE >

Humans, Animals, Plants etc.

< BIOSPHERE ◎MICRO>

PHYSICAL WORLD >

MALE TO FEMALE SEX > NOT UNDERSTANDING OF ANYTHING MORE COMPLEX THAN ITSELF > SELFIE > MIRROR > UNDERSTANDING OF THE SAME & OF THE LESS COMPLEX SYSTEMS > LEARNT TO HANDLE THE ANIMALS > INDIVIDUAL SKILLS & CRAFTS DEVELOPMENT > ZOOMING GLASS > BACTERIA > MEDICINE > MOLECULE > ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT > TRANSISTOR > ATOM >HIGGS BOSSON > ZOOMING IN >

LIMITED TIME >

INDIVIDUAL or INDIVIDUALLY DERIVED

DOWN ˅ DOWNWARDS or SHORTER TIME DISCREPANCIES>

Chapter 9— Space Travel & Ongoing Discrepancies

As someone raised to enjoy looking at sky and, as someone that always loved the stars AND the science, that accidentally developed some mythological & metaphysical & symbological knowledge about the constellations and of our heavens, our fixed stars, planets & of pretty much everything celestial, for a while now, accompanied by others I seem to have grown some quite intense percentage of distrust in space agencies and the space exploration programs (generally), both because of my individually noted discrepancies & other rather collectively & universally recognised issues with much of the important programs of our current day space agencies; such as NASA, SpaceX, ESA, and a variety other agencies are. And the most of the other thinking individuals I had a chance of interacting with in regards to this matter seemingly act with almost identical distrust & scepticism, individually trying with fact-checking of the facts that these organisations declare as such, mainly because of more than just a couple of ongoing discrepancies, which seem to be lasting for more than a while now, but now seeming as something really absurd at this point and in current day & age.

And instead of debating the history of NASA, my own or someone else’s conspiracies, let’s just try to speak UNIVERSALLY stating COLLECTIVELY KNOWN FACTS & PUBLICLY shared information, most of us should probably be familiar with and so, lets start by debating recent examples and from Elon Musk and SpaceX, or let us go back 15 years earlier, and start from looking at Richard Branson`s teeth and Virgin Galactic or from “fresh new one in the game” Mr Jeff Bezos and his Blue Origin, or from pretty much any other fully blown INDIVIDUAL with a USA based multi-million-dollar-business, that started always very modestly, always having these points of publicly remembering of their modest beginnings, of selling ice cream, used vinyl records & pants, shipping all from a small garage in Idaho, or something, something just punk enough to appear as rock, yet with a plastic surgery in the half of it & MTV POP little mermaid twist of sudden success in enterpreneuring of the entire fu****ng SPACE EXPLORATION COMPANIES (always on their own) further at some points INDIVIDUALLY & personally involved with the design of the (Hitlers, VonBrauns) ROCKETS with nice logos on them, reflecting always that these will “soon be able” to take first rich people and millioners (read, friends of these) to, well, seemingly anywhere & to the stars (but seemingly more often to the stars that are like themselves, not really the stars in our sky).

And all previously stated examples so far DID NOT SEEM TO WORK out, DECLARING to the most which cared, but quite SILENTLY THOUGH, that WE COLLECTIVELY factually seem to be:

UNABLE of travelling ABOVE the level of our BIOSPHERE

Which is a matter probably solvable through the development of new technologies or better said through a progression, but, truly troublesome seems to be the fact that our astrophysicists & other scientists are collectively not familiar with the reasons behind why we can`t currently conduct such.

Further on discrepancies; If such travel was possible (using rockets) we would certainly many years ago but also now (though, on YOUTUBE) be seeing this special of: “Richard Branson, Keith Richards, Elon Musk & Mark Zuckerberg’s father Jeff Bezos, drinking their whiskey cocaine on their whores of cosmos, in front of the fully waving American Flag stacked directly into the Moon-Hoax-Spacex-Shuttles-Shaft to which Snoop Dog superglued Donald Trump Wigg.” or the ~similar such. But, since not a single one of these rockets was actually successful in transportation of life (outside of CGI animations & some ODDISEY 2001 studio recordings) which all factually THESE NEW or still ONGOING DISCREPANCIES seemingly do seem to be declaring, further simply obliging us to finally COLLECTIVELY & UNIVERSALLY CONCLUDE that WE SURELY HAVEN`T BEEN TO THE MOON, EVER, but also as well as more than a few things more; probably in regards to the reasons of occurrences of these ongoing discrepancies & further of their support structures & of course further of their management. Additionally to all previously stated, with the Russian digging of the 14 KM hole we again (also silently) declared to the entire world that we are factually unable to get anything downwards also as well.

THIS NOWHERE WRITTEN FACT SEEMS TO BE STATING THAT WE ARE UNABLE TO GET ANYTHING OUT OF THE LEVEL OF OUR OWN BIOSPHERE

We should (at least) collectively finally become familiar with the reasons why such a task is an impossible one currently. And after all that being said, we could probably deduct a hand full of aspects about (in the lack of better words) this global corporate cancerstill burning our only atmosphere, since Hitlers time and with Hitler’s developed technologies (VonBrauns rockets), developed by one of these stereotypically American entrepreneurial miracle & collective success structure managed by “an individual” & by “himself”.

How did these particular * collectives form in the first place?

* governments, corporations, institutions, manufacturers, groups, etc…

Chapter 10 — MANAGEMENT & the ORGANISATION of the SYSTEMS & the FORMATION of COLLECTIVES

The explanation is simple & I`d try to form it UNIVERSALLY like:

Individuals that behaved quite orderly, which planned & organised themselves (and eventually others around them) logically, in a previously-non-organised or structured (or chaotic) sociological surrounding, have successfully developed, discovered, produced or created:

(PROGRESSION)

  1. (STRUCTURING or ORGANISATION METHODS of MATERIALS — MATERIAL GOODS) PROGRESSION: Tools, machinery & methods for organisation & utilisation of other, Less-complex systems (animals, plants, bacteria…).
  2. (STRUCTURING or ORGANISATION METHODS of LESS-COMPLEX-SYSTEMS) PROGRESSION: Food production — fruit & vegetable cultivation, animal farms & farming, agriculture & large-sized plant harvesting etc.
  3. (STRUCTURING or ORGANISATION METHODS of SAME-COMPLEX-SYSTEMS) PROGRESSION: Starting probably with the organisation of *their own environment & homes, *families, and further around forming *tribes & *groups, and further, larger collectives such as armies, unions and eventually institutions & other, more complex sociological structures…
  4. (STRUCTURING or ORGANISATION METHODS for interaction with MORE-COMPLEX-SYSTEMS) PROGRESSION: Employing healers — shamans — remedy creators in tribes, and further, structuring religions & religious institutions, philosophers, sciences, universities, experiments, and further, structuring NASA, Large Hadron Collider, ESA, SpaceX, Virgin Galactic etc?

This appears to be the common sense progression & logical explanation of CREATION & of DEVELOPMENTS of various of our COLLECTIVE STRUCTURES (a demonstrational progression, probably universally applicable to all our existing socio-political structures).

It appears that a significantly larger percentage of the INDIVIDUALS that are claiming that INDIVIDUALISM seems to be the only successful method in ORGANISATION of any possible COLLECTIVE, somehow (NATURALLY) do take quite of an active role in DETECTING & POINTING OUT any potentially manifested DIFFERENCE (in processing of anything) that they INDIVIDUALLY DETECTED, initially between THEM (in their INDIVIDUAL processing of anything) and OTHER INDIVIDUALS (in their processing of anything).

It`s quite important to be declared and said that all these PROCESSES that do further DIFFERENTIATING and CATEGORISING of our INDIVIDUALS by their manifested DIFFERENCES (in their processing of anything) would ultimately if developed fully, as the end result would have the DESTRUCTION of RELATIONSHIPS, because RELATIONSHIPS are factually based on the UNDERSTANDING, and in order for any UNDERSTANDING to occur in the first place, you must SHARE some SIMILARITIES with the other side. Further DIVISION & AMPLIFICATION of the DIFFERENCES is resulting in the DESTRUCTION of UNDERSTANDING between INDIVIDUALS and their (nowadays, even of NATURAL) RELATIONSHIPS & CONNECTIONS that can exist & be formed between these. This process of DIFFERENTIATION is (NATURALLY) DIVIDING INDIVIDUALS that (NATURALLY) must be or act UNIFIED or UNITED, in order to FORM or STRUCTURE anything, larger than themselves and/or COLLECTIVELY.

Previously stated seems to factually be reflecting quite a lot of what is appearing to be the state of our world; 70 years long USA leadership & further promotion of the INDIVIDUALISM, and by ANY MEANS, through a plethora of different methods. Say, through ACADEMIA by quite intense promotion or propagandism of works like Ayn Rand’s “Atlas^ Shrugged×”, through ECONOMICS by forced application of the Chicago Boys (Chicago School of Economics (Milton Friedman & others)), and through all other areas of life by, all means. All previously mentioned, factually resulting with the destruction of COLLECTIVIST STATES & COMMUNISM and so, for its presumably particular set of reasons that we could & should publicly debate on in ACADEMIA much, much more & much deeper, since, nowadays, these developments, progressed as they now seem to be resulting with the destruction of the UNDERSTANDING between INDIVIDUALS, COLLECTIVISM & therefore with the DESTRUCTION OF THE COLLECTIVE, itself.

And that means much more than any of our INDIVIDUALS can ever be able to COMPREHEND, since, such rather requires our COLLECTIVE understanding.

UNIVERSALLY: Start seems to be in our researching of the naturally occurring Duality & by OUR LOGIC; And through confirming it through the real-life data which means, yes, solely through STATISTICS and our SCIENCES.

The existing Universal, Mythological, Etymological, Psychological, Sociological, Structural, Religious & Astrological Symbols, their meanings & their combinatorics, seems to be showing something, actually quite RESEARCHABLE & with quite MEASURABLE information in it.

Chapter 11 — GLOBALISATION, INDIVIDUALISM & further DESTRUCTION of COLLECTIVISM — IDEA behind NAZISM — the JEWISH QUESTION

INDIVIDUALISM (or more accurately defined SYSTEM OF INDIVIDUALS) & INDIVIDUALS that claim that such a system seems to be the only way of structuring of the COLLECTIVE, SEEM TO BE directly LEADING the further DESTRUCTION OF THE UNDERSTANDING between INDIVIDUALS and therefore, of the COLLECTIVE itself and, even of the natural linkage between individuals (especially on a larger scale nowadays, with FACEBOOK & other tools) so the COLLECTIVES are rapidly experiencing various forms of DEGRADATION. It also seemingly appears as if the DEGRADATION of the COLLECTIVE is usually first shown by a PROGRESSION: subtle < intense tendency of our societies to be moving away from any larger STRUCTURES, GROUPS, UNIONS & INSTITUTIONS to a variety of TRIBALISM & TRIBAL or TRIBE A LIKE BEHAVIOR & STRUCTURINGS (Banking Cartel, Political Cartel, Institutional Cartels etc), that pretty much all our current day societies are seemingly heavily experiencing for more than a while now, but just to be clear, this story of mine appears of not really being a story about our classes; well, at least NOT in that MARXIST view & sense or (more recently) in that social warrior form of it… as I never and in any point wanted to implicate limiting of anyone’s freedom as a solution, this rather appears as a matter of culture, good manners & civilised behaviour of oneself; though seemingly appearing that these INDIVIDUALS seem to be directly resulting with limiting freedom of, well, all of us.

It seems important to point out that many of these “developments”, combined with our achieved technologies result in some quite intense percentage of probability of us actually deriving OUR OWN EXTINCTION. Furthermore, as WE are the only rulers of our biosphere, this highly likely indicate also, the death of all other creatures currently coexisting with us in our only BIOSPHERE…

This matter is appearing as if we are following the madman logic or some logic discrepancy, yet, it seems to be the only logic we use, and for a while now and further on, even nowadays, still. And that’s… What is that!?

I tried, very hard to think about how these issues in perpetual cancer alike structural developments started occurring and as it seemed that intensification of such seems occurred in our recent history, and as I personally experienced amplification or large structural changes throughout my country, seemingly making me quite experienced and further now probably appearing a bit like some conspiracy theorist of a sort of, but when discussing of this matter, but I just have to point out a few historical issues with this Individual to the Collective conspiracy seemingly appearing as something, well, successfully implemented or successfully conspired:

  • Seems as if something REALLY happened during the time of Nazi Germany & the second world war (on a global scale) with the rulers of the Globalists/Jews/Khazars/Illuminati or Whatever we call `em AND the Hitler association (that’s judging by all other developments seems done a great thing to Israel & well, Jews at the end) which kept the good old alchemy & other esoteric pieces of knowledge (astrology, metaphysics, symbolism etc) still here & further developed, but totally not shared to anyone else on our planet.
  • Israel was founded in 1948, by this “new” Germany, and as a consequence of the Holocaust (which actually (in the real-life data) mainly tried to eradicate collectivists and Marxism oriented people) and same applies as well to the most of the newly formed European & the American & the most of the Asian & to almost ALL OTHER (as Germans say) POST-WESTPHALIAN states. *referring to North-Rhine-Westphalia, or better said and easier understood, to POST-WEST-GERMANY formed states & collective entities. Further, judging by the real-life data (solely) these seem to be indicating that all these, our core structures and therefore all our Institutions were rearranged and got new parts, add-ons & ideas behind them, seemingly all actually implemented, well, back then (all data which actually for some reason seem to be very nicely correlated with our cancer rates, or the numbers of the cancer cases, as well).
  • All of which (in all recorded cases) Collectivist or Collective oriented (Communist) nations & states were damaged or being broken fully either during that or during more than several other wars, and afterwards, via almost identical methods (of which the main one was the establishment of the dictatorship, by either an outsider (or outside set) INDIVIDUAL, or a non-virtuous or corrupt insider (again AN INDIVIDUAL), after which, entire systems (THE COLLECTIVES) were gradually or even instantly declared as defunct, or a non-functional systems & institutions even non-functional collectives (and even A BAD COLLECTIVES / LOWER RACES / SAVAGES / or SHITHOLES (AS TRUMP, an (again) FULL BLOWN INDIVIDUALIST and the open supporter of Israel, actually SAYS, very much out loud)).
  • It was always quite interesting to be pointed out as something quite peculiar, that all 3 Abrahamic Religions were actually created by the Jewish school or well, temples. So both Christianity, Islam & Judaism, easily factually fit under single one & the same school of well, religious or philosophic thought or metaphysical ideas or religious promo material. And historically, after spreading these, seemingly all lands appear to have started with their further division, clusterisation, and further differentiation. Jesus did divide the sea with his hands, and the sea actually seemingly appears to be the Roman Empire (better said the Roman Republic).
  • It appears as if the mythological and metaphysical structure or the religious, factually actually does have some influence in the real life of everyone, and since, we stopped with these philosophies of “the old world” and in believing or giving any significance to the myths and in many, usually naturally reflected gods or principles (Sun, Moon, Zeus, Jupiter, Perun, Hades, Hermes & all others) and since we collectively over 2 millennia period slowly started believing that an Individual itself can be a GOD, well, like all these prophets & sons of God, or better said Messianic figures & Messianic principles, seem to be, which are in principle, by all logic, factually progressing these particular INDIVIDUALS to appear almost as GOD, or god alike something, that seemingly appears of being real-life reflected something, actually seemingly aligned with a lot of what’s been happening for these last 2000 years and symbolically speaking, the same progressions nowadays seems to be maybe even, further resulting in this ultimate progression of an individual, seen nowadays (factually showcased, at a seemingly universal limits level & therefore, possibly dangerously intense levels of the matter).
  • It is known that Jewish and many other entities were factually badly treated by the Roman entity and that as such was never accepted to become the part of a such. That further seemingly resulted with brilliantly conducted strategy & quite of a long-term plan of a particularly small collective, that seems as the successfully implemented one, but nowadays we globally must universally understand that our seemingly universally present Messiah principle, simply isn’t really UNIVERSAL at this point in time any longer, since the logic appears to point that an INDIVIDUAL can only via COLLECTIVE and only act like the GOD, though it can NEVER actually BECOME a ONE as an INDIVIDUAL. So mainly since it’s INDIVIDUAL TIME will always remain LIMITED.

Chapter 12—SCIENCE RESEARCH on the SYMBOLS — STATISTICAL ANALYSIS on Mythology, Celestial & Ephemeral Symbology, Etymology, Linguistics

* PURELY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH on the origins of the ASTROLOGY

If anyone just tried and researched the subject in the manner it required as such and in the first place (with an understanding of the influence of particular celestial, position, relation to the other, definitions, generalised stuff for the start) we`d get up to roundabout 98.8% of CORRELATIONS with Particular Celestial Movements, we just spoke of; All of which seems at least 30x roundabout less abstract & seemingly more precise to test, than any of our current day and age Psychological & Sociological tests are, which are going so easy as the SCIENCE and as “statistically correlated & proven“.

HOW WEIRD IS THAT THERE’S NO INFORMATION OF A SINGLE SERIOUS, REAL-LIFE DATA DRIVEN & ASTRO-LOGICALLY CORRECT, PURELY STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CELESTIAL INFLUENCE ON OUR COGNITION? HOW COME? IF: SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH WOULD PRESUME THE STATEMENT OF THE CLAIMER IS RIGHT AND BY WHICHEVER METHOD STATISTICALLY OR THROUGH SCIENCE EITHER CONFIRM OR OPPOSE IT, USING SOLELY THE SCIENTIFIC METHODS, SUCH AS OUR REAL-LIFE DATA & THE DATA ANALYSIS. HOW COME WE NEVER DID THAT?

  • And whoa, we’re back to our conspiracy theories for Hitler / Jews / Khazars / Illuminati / Queen / Vatican / and other secret-WHAT-EVERS…

And please, don`t take me wrong here; Some people did actually conducted some researching on the potential influence of the say, the Moon or the planet Mars, but ALL of the currently EXISTING materials I found so far seemingly appear to be structured or researched in a form which is MYTHOLOGICALLY, SYMBOLICALLY & ASTRO-LOGICALLY, IN THE BEGINNING, TOTALLY FALSE & NOT CORRECT & not-aligned with what these bits of knowledge & those claims actually tried pointing out.

Is it so hard to try with the CORRECT METHOD:

  1. Gathering a smaller team of people which claim they understand Etymology, Symbology, Astrology, Mythology, Astronomy, Physics & Ephemeral data (for the start).
  2. Asking them to point where the influence shall be detected with the most strength and with as much as the description or information quality.
  3. AFTERWARDS STATISTICALLY & THROUGH THE REAL LIFE DATA ANALYSIS CONDUCT THE ACTUAL RESEARCH OF THE EXISTENCE OF CLAIMED CORRELATION. Only in that form, this would be: “A both scientifically and astrologically correct way & approach to either prove it or disclaim it.”

Let us UPDATE ROUNDABOUT 20 000 YEARS of our COLLECTIVE KNOWLEDGE & theories to check if they EXIST IN THE REAL-LIFE DATA?

An entire universe of things is existing in there, but also in all our religions and old beliefs, and is being “stored” there, for a very good reason, by all our previous thinkers. The Planets, The Fixed Stars, The Houses, The Signs, The Moons, The Asteroids & Their Relationships, Their Movement & So Much More.

The real problem I seemingly have with this matter is in the actual interpretation or translated sentences, since, they seem to translate into somewhat quite precise and very particular & applicable symbolics of any given moment or a chunk of time. AND THESE ARE SEEMINGLY ALWAYS BOTH, APPLICABLE TO ONE INDIVIDUAL ONLY, yet UNIVERSAL & APPLICABLE TO COLLECTIVES, NEVERTHELESS.

SCIENCE RESEARCH on the ORIGINS of the ASTROLOGY, MYTHOLOGY, ART, SYMBOLOGY & more

Astro Meta-Physics Foundation is an OPEN-SOURCE, NON-PROFITABLE ORGANISATION deriving a truthful & scientifically measurable utilisation method of our ephemeral progressing & seemingly to all of our collective subjects such like mythological, symbolic, astrological and astrologically oriented knowledge, which is here actually used for only one thing; To further Guide or do the “fine-tuning” of STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, HEURISTICS, MACHINE LEARNING & NEURAL NETWORKS and of better said, purely SCIENTIFIC TOOLS. Guiding mainly statistical analysis & statistical analysis tools & other data sorting mechanism to a probable firmer alignment to the data appearing in our UNIVERSAL DATA, as FREE and OPEN-SOURCED, GLOBALLY.

AUTHOR: Jugovic Stefan www.stefanjugovic.com @ 2016