UNIFIED SCIENCE & the ABSTRACTION of the UNIVERSAL “INDIVIDUAL to the COLLECTIVE” STRUCTURING to a UNIFIED FIELD of EMERGENT: TIME, MEANING & EVERYTHING ELSE — UNIVERSAL INFORMATION PROGRESSING —PURELY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH on the ORIGINS OF CELESTIAL & EPHEMERAL SYMBOLOGY, MYTHOLOGY, ASTROLOGY, RELIGION, ETYMOLOGY & on LINGUISTICS
INDIVIDUAL of the COLLECTIVE as the first derived STRUCTURING of the UNIVERSAL — the derived UNIVERSAL INFORMATION PROGRESSING implicating the SAMENESS of TIME & of MEANING & other — a DEFINITION of UNDERSTANDING — INDIVIDUALISM & PROGRESSING of the INDIVIDUAL—SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH on the ORIGINS of ASTROLOGY
Here I’ll be discussing this logic I accidentally seemingly derived as a consequence of the inclusion of our universal (naturally occurring) “individual to the collective” predisposition in combination with a plethora of other metaphysical, religious, mythological, ephemeral or celestial symbolics (or better said, pieces of our collective unconscious). And this text has a goal of describing this structure, mainly because such to me seemingly appeared as a unique something, that further seems to be applicable in derision of a real-life applicable logic for conduction of any structural analysis or structuring or any possible formation process. Furthermore, as I didn’t found nor stumbled upon any similar structuring or logic anywhere else, I published this paper, to share and to speak of these ideas and thoughts.
Of course, any matter with the imposed abstraction level as this matter tries posing, will surely APPEAR AS TOO COMPLEX & NOT-FOR-EVERYONE’s UNDERSTANDING of it, but after my social experience progressed, I must declare that I’m no longer interested in debating this matter with everyone, as I previously seemingly was doing (as a civilized human being). But, luckily, there will be some of you which will understand this abstract matter & by doing so be acknowledging my efforts & time I invested in putting of all this together. Also, as that’s pretty much all I ever had in mind & wanted regarding this & any other abstraction I was publicly speaking of (and also probably in regards to the abstraction of my life as a whole, as well) this text surely will appear as “a bit” chaotic & too intense (similarly to how I naturally appear) so I’ll must declare that this text wasn’t written to either appear (in any form), or to seem & sound in any manner as a totally professional, fully scientific research or to present me as an professional scientist someone, nor this structuring of which I wrote of, really requires such level of design, semantics, perfect spelling and grammar since it much rather has as the main goal feature of reaching close to being UNIVERSAL, much rather unifying & connecting (or seeing the big picture); but frankly with a sense of urgency of publishing & sharing conclusions of some of my discoveries. So, in this text, I wrote solely of these conclusions & of some other discoveries I personally derived that (to me) appeared as nowhere seen, or as thoughts having enough of specificity or uniqueness in their derived abstractions or having enough of real-life applicability, or just enough of truthful but not so tragic, with some spirit or hope behind; all specifications & features which personally put these as some matter appearing as ~important.
To me, it seems as if, that moment of everyone’s understanding of this structure I am speaking of, seems like a quite of a plausible and, sort of a quite possibly unavoidable occurrence, in every case and scenario of which I can think of…
Chapter 1—GLOBAL COLLECTIVE SYSTEM of INDIVIDUALS ~ INDIVIDUALISM and its results in amplification of PROGRESSING of the INDIVIDUALS (to a size of a COLLECTIVE) — Derision of the UNIVERSAL INFORMATION PROGRESSING & its implication resulting the SAMENESS of TIME, MEANING & of all other EMERGENCIES
It appears as if and when we are progressing any INDIVIDUAL to fit the size or act in form of any INSTITUTION or better said COLLECTIVE (and have the same number of interactions as these have), as such, always seems to be showcasing results that are rather & more often pointing out that an INDIVIDUAL CANNOT and should NOT BE or ACT as an INSTITUTION, mainly because the results of such actions seem to be taking several, rather quite predictable possible OUTCOMES. These seem to be: either a BURNOUT of that particular INDIVIDUAL, or it’s further PROGRESSION, ultimately up to its natural limits. Which would actually strongly influence the formation of nature given either a BULLY or an AUTOCRAT (as male) or a PROMISCUOUS WOMAN or a PROSTITUTE (as female); Both three previously mentioned, in our current day system of INDIVIDUALISM and/or CAPITALISM, seemingly appear to be quite of a Suficitiary specificities, existing and seen, well, globally everywhere…
Furthermore, we COLLECTIVELY act as if we’d at some point agreed on a proposition that an INDIVIDUAL can ACT or BECOME any INSTITUTION of any sort… Which seems to be the proposition that factually appears of being both physically, psychologically & sociologically an IMPOSSIBLE one.
So as it seems that any INDIVIDUAL, when PROGRESSED rather, appears as being LIMITED by it’s own NATURALLY PRESENT LIMITS, as such is drastically more often structuring itself into structure not transcending far further from its particular NATURALLY PRESENT LIMITS, visually well showcased in these two examples of NATURALLY occurred, PROGRESSED INDIVIDUALS, that seemingly appear acting as INSTITUTIONS (and so mainly because of their numbers of interactions with other individuals):
– A BULLY — which is a progressed Male
Father, Tribe Head, Autocrat, Mafia, Muscles, Godfather, Jay-Z
– A PROSTITUTE — which is a progressed Female
Mother, Shelter, Nymph, Promiscuous, Escort, Rhianna
- Also, as I’ve acted or seemingly appeared as both previously mentioned, and as NOT (at all) unique or standalone case in acting as such, I surely have all the experience which would make me able of debating such, well, seemingly FULLY NOT-DEBATED “case”…
It seems that without some logically imposed limit, there’s only one other limit that we could hit and that one is the limit of the real-life data or better said THE UNIVERSAL LIMIT, and, we COLLECTIVELY seem to be hitting that one intensely and for a while now in regards to our INDIVIDUALS. Process of DIFFERENTIATION between our INDIVIDUALS appears of course as a PROGRESSION of a particular sort, but, as the intensity of such, for a while now seems as quite measurably growing exponentially, if I may add so, since the first, but especially after the second world war, I’d like to also digress a bit to analyze and debate of these developments further in this text, during which, instead of presenting to all of you my personally derived facts (confirming my abstractions), I’d much rather structure some of your own facts, or better said some of our collective knowledge and data that hopefully both you and I (and others) should also know or be familiar with… And therefore, I would in some sense, be manipulating with our COLLECTIVELY SHARED DATA & so with a clear goal of being both polite and of trying to be UNIVERSAL (and as much as I possibly can).
A PROPER * INTRODUCTION to the UNIVERSAL STRUCTURING & the UNIFIED SCIENCE(s):
Introduction to a structurization of the unified science(s) and this universal structural analysis — Structuring logic (accidentally) derived (by me) consequentially, as a result of the comparison of the outcome of any information, universally, and therefore, dually progressed, researching this (built-in or naturally occurring) universality (and the natural structuring) obviously structuring itself further from our Individual — Collective predisposition clearly resulting in structuring all our derived meanings, or better said, differings of the end results of any universally progressed information. Progressing the universal information of an any sort and as such: image, gesture, meaning, word, symbol, formation, system, group, structure, process, function, action etc; meanings that’s being progressed universally, and as such as BOTH of an INDIVIDUAL and as the part of the COLLECTIVE (group, species, or even better said, the LIFE, itself).
This INDIVIDUAL to the COLLECTIVE predisposition seems like a crucial requirement or step required for emerging of any possible STRUCTURING or FORMATION. Also, as UNIVERSAL LOGIC appears dictating that any potentially conducted UNIVERSAL INFORMATION PROGRESSING REQUIRES inclusion this DUALITY in its particular UNIVERSAL PROGRESSING that further seems to be implicating that derival of any achieved (MEANING) STRUCTURING seems to be emergent in PROGRESSING of the INFORMATION UNIVERSALLY and as such, through BOTH and (as an INDIVIDUAL & as the COLLECTIVE) as such DUALLY, as a:
1. TIME-LIMITED SYSTEMS (an INDIVIDUAL) °
2. NON-TIME-LIMITED SYSTEMS (the COLLECTIVE) ~
* Which implies that BOTH TIME & MEANING EMERGE as the SAME FORMATION & STRUCTURING…?
* Therefore ALL STRUCTURES seem to be EMERGENT from APPROXIMATING or DIFFERENTIATION of the OUTCOME (of the end results) of any UNIVERSALLY PROGRESSED INFORMATION…?
* UNIVERSALLY PROGRESSED INFORMATION is here any UNIVERSAL INFORMATION, PROGRESSED UNIVERSALLY and as such DUALLY, both as AN INDIVIDUAL and as the part of THE COLLECTIVE…?
Chapter 2 — It (universally, collectively) seems
It seems as if it’s more than a proper time to take a different approach & unify our logic that is of course and as such, used in our researching of the UNIVERSE (and of whats naturally occurring) and in this text I`ll try to example of how to do so, utilizing a very first, oldest but nevertheless, quite particular, UNIVERSAL logic which tries to inter-connect our current categorization of the naturally present data that is appearing as not-inter-connected or unified to a single system (connecting it all); Limited by our (current day) rather INDIVIDUAL logic and limits of the INDIVIDUALS, themselves, so: Astronomy, Philosophy, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Psychology, Sociology, Mythology, Linguistics, Etymology, Religious, Ethnology, Symbology… become UNIFIED, under one field, of UNIFIED SCIENCE; Under which, our operation of thought and presumptions, abstracts, logic or any information structuring is not limited by any means to our limits but, to limits of what we are exploring, which is in this case, The Universe, itself.
So, HOW DO WE UNDERSTAND OUR UNIVERSE?
No, scratch that because more than half of the people can’t really define WHAT THE UNDERSTANDING ACTUALLY IS, so yeah, we must start from there now.
Chapter 3 — Definition of Understanding
UNDERSTANDING IS when we (as systems (like me and you now)) guide our own probability calculation to correlate to the other systems real-life data that approximated its probability calculation, while not limiting our probability calculation to our own & other systems probability calculation limits reached up to that moment, as these limits are neither the limits that are existing in our universal data nor the limits of that other systems probability calculation, but limits that exist solely in our current logic and, these would, therefore, be NON-EXISTENT-in-a-real-life-data.
As non-debated but nevertheless quite factual is the conclusion that we are still incapable of DISCOVERING of anything of whats laying further & beyond our biosphere, and here (in case you didn’t know so) I`m just stating the fact that:
A DISCOVERY can be defined as our moment of UNDERSTANDING of the (real-life applicable) LOGIC used for arranging of some part of our naturally existing data or better said of the UNIVERSAL INFORMATION.
And, since our current day, scientific discoveries are much more often made through our INDIVIDUAL UNDERSTANDING of the various pieces of our universal information, it seems rather logical (to me at least) that, in order to get able to understand of anything that’s MORE COMPLEX (and above us, and there, in COSMOS, all around us), we first seemingly need to be able to comprehend of our own level (and in its totality) and that factually, logically does include or require us to be reaching to our COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING of this & of many other areas of what LIFE appears to be.
Chapter 4 — UNIVERSAL DUALITY of ONESELF
INDIVIDUAL life to death “exposition” and “thoughts” are a “finite” systems and as such, their interaction seems to be limited to either similar systems or pretty much to an any other of less complex systems and, some common sense seems to be indicating that in our biosphere as individual human beings, we interact with, either other individuals, or with a variety of other of what seemingly appears to be LESS COMPLEX than we are (Animals, Plants etc).
A LESS COMPLEX SYSTEM than you is “a probability calculation system which is to a lesser extent aligned to the real-life-data of the universe than your own system”; and by this, I could put all your animals, plants & other less or lesser complex systems or systems with even more limited times or the (real-life) data processing.
COLLECTIVELY (either as “the life” and “the species”) we seem to not have any issue in the “TRANSCENDING” of our individual TIME frames. On the other hand, nowadays, we do seem to have a problem in our logic (doing the arranging of the data) and furthermore this particular individual to the collective thing seems nowadays as actually fully non-understood part of us, further resulting creation of a particular LOGIC DISCREPANCY, of which the most of you probably never thought of, any deeper level than your own; mainly because, as INDIVIDUALS, both of us last for some time, or have a particular exposition or a time discrepancy, during which we are processing, well, our real-life (universal) data; which further directly implicates that our individual time for processing anything is limited and further on, that when an INDIVIDUAL dies one particularity occurs, which is that our COLLECTIVE actually STORES all of what that INDIVIDUAL was, and so, all his unique achievements or universally said, probably all his achieved complexities, all of what he discovered, did, said, liked & more… So, as individuals can NOT naturally transcend their time limits, it should be UNDERSTOOD further that our collectives naturally do so, and here, important information seems to be that if the collective (say species) dies out, that, is an EXTINCTION, which further, judged by any logic derived from our real-life data, appears of being a such an immensely different event than any INDIVIDUAL DEATH itself; mainly because it seems that upon such an event, IMMENSELY MORE ENERGY becomes either RELEASED or STORED…
Isn`t that actually, HOW ALL OUR current day FUELS are being created!?
Fossil fuel & oils (were made by the extinction and these) release 10 times more energy than say, burnt wood or burnt alcohol. All 3 of these previously mentioned were being made through some timed systematic death of a sort. Which seems to be nicely aligned to what old Philosophy, Metaphysics, Alchemy tried declaring.
Digging a bit deeper, I think I discovered something really weird here!
Chapter 5 — * INDIVIDUAL of the COLLECTIVE LOGIC DISCREPANCY most of you (probably) never thought of earlier:
Let’s use our statistics & try to give some universal Definition to the word SUCCESS (in the most generalised and universal way possible):
A probability calculation method applied to the real-life data which got aligned better to the real-life data or the Universe (all around it) than *all others (*Losers)…?
So, let`s now try to define the same word both as an Individual (Person) and as the Collective (Group/Institution/Species/Life)…
For an Individual: SUCCESS — Because of the builtin Exposition or a limited time discrepancy (and as such, as a TIME-LIMITED-SYSTEM) this would seem to be to get some EASIER TIME SPENT (fewer losses in or smoother universal progressing) than all other involved parties (*losers)…!?
/ achieving HAPPINESS /
For the Collective: SUCCESS — Because it`s a NON-TIME-LIMITED system, this seems to be to JUST SURVIVE/NOT DIE out or BE EXTINCT… !?!?
/ achieving IMMORTALITY /
For THESE “SYSTEMS”, in this particular case, seem to be appearing as DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED SYSTEMS…!?
This “discovery” seemed to me as more than a quite an important “thing” I`ve stumbled upon while brainstorming and further on, since I didn’t seem to find anything online or anywhere else regarding this particular matter, or this particular logic issue, I just felt again like I`m going crazy (again)…
If you ever heard of anyone speaking of this matter, please leave the link or a comment below, because it seems as if the only resources I`ve found about this particular matter, are written by myself!????????
Chapter 6 — IN & OUT of this WORLD— INDIVIDUAL to the COLLECTIVE LOGIC — UNDERSTANDING of SYSTEMS that are MORE COMPLEX
We should be able to find the logic that appears as more aligned to the universally occurring data (or to our UNIVERSAL LIMITS), that may further do the guiding our probability calculators (or the BRAINS) to a better or more firm alignment with what is naturally occurring all around us (in our UNIVERSE), of course, while remaining scientific & objective pretty much all the way through. Reason for doing so (momentarily) appears to be and I`d use a sentence that NOAM CHOMSKY often says: “the actual further SURVIVAL of ORGANISED LIFE ON EARTH”. And since in some sense it seems as if a drastically smaller percentage of our INDIVIDUALS seem to be defacto resulting this DEGRADATION of our COLLECTIVE (even consciously & quite intentionally lowering occurrence of UNDERSTANDING between various INDIVIDUALS) & such, if progressed seems to be resulting in further gaps or amplification of occurring differences, seemingly appearing as expressed everywhere & in all aspects of life, since, even regarding the crucial aspects of life like CLIMATE CHANGE appears of being, our (“non-existent”) UNIFIED STRUCTURING seems rather unable of STRUCTURING any type of the functional COLLECTIVE that appears as non-cancerous or that in it’s core doesn’t follow the INDIVIDUAL as such, factually solely responsible for the implementation of this currently expressed CANCER-CELL-LOGIC of GROWTH, by any means.
Furthermore judging from our current day globally manifested issues expressed all over our structures & systems, our social, political & neuro-psychological and throughout our COLLECTIVE, we seem as quite limited in UNDERSTANDING OUR OWN SYSTEM, and to me, that is further implicating the existence of some imposed limit or a logic disability, seemingly functionally disabling us in UNDERSTANDING of any SYSTEM appearing to be MORE COMPLEX than OUR SYSTEM IS or universally said, than WE COLLECTIVELY SEEM TO BE.
But, as this seems to be rather set to even lower COMPLEXITY (than the complexity of our system) and to the level of COMPLEXITY of our INDIVIDUALS, this INDIVIDUAL to the COLLECTIVE “thing” seems as quite of a UNIVERSAL SOLUTION for structuring anything, appearing as potential solution of many of our current “map of problematique” moments of stagnancy, I’d just suggest to research & utilise the matter, and, if possible, as quickly as possible. Furthermore as our currently applied logic seems to be set into a quite particular LOGIC DISCREPANCY of a sort of & to our INDIVIDUALS that seem to be actively trying to rule the COLLECTIVE; a particular development which should by any real-life applicable logic actually, as a result, have further DESTRUCTION OF IT. As NATURALLY OCCURRED we are, as such, in a quite proper sense of it, UNIVERSAL. To understand structuring and how any potential STRUCTURING seems to occur; and in order to UNDERSTAND (in its totality) of what is OUR OWN LEVEL, WE are REQUIRED to acknowledge that ALL STRUCTURES are derived from this INDIVIDUAL to the COLLECTIVE predisposition and further also that IN our BIOSPHERE, WE seem to be able to INTERACT with EITHER SIMILAR or with a variety of other SYSTEMS of the SAME COMPLEXITY (as we are), and with pretty much all other, LESS-COMPLEX SYSTEMS (than we seemingly are, such as our animals, plants etc). So, rather a common sense & naturally occurred logic seems to be indicating that in order to scientifically research what’s ABOVE our own BIOSPHERE, WE ARE REQUIRED to GO BEYOND OUR INDIVIDUAL LIMITATIONS and to UNDERSTAND, OPTIMISE and UTILISE our COLLECTIVE systems (which seems to be the moment that’s going to occur, in every case or scenario I can currently think of).
This matter seems nicely correlated with logic raising from an example in which we are assigned with a quest of building a skyscraper; structure much more complex than we individually are, exampling the process that seems to pointing out our NATURES & UNIVERSAL ruling over us & inflicting us with this NATURAL requirement of conducting so through the utilisation of our COLLECTIVE much, much rather than doing so as an INDIVIDUAL; mainly because, it seems highly unlikely that INDIVIDUALLY you can be able to build it on your own, either without knowledge or skills which other individuals perfected & SHARED, and further without their coordinated (read SHARED) power & plethora of other, COLLECTIVELY DERIVED things.
IMPORTANT: It seems that these COLLECTIVE SYSTEMS are, judged through all existing real-life derived logic, only existing non-time-limited systems we have. Those parts (of us & of life) seem to be only “TRANSCENDENTAL” parts we have that allow surpassing of our INDIVIDUAL TIME FRAMES, but also, as naturally occurred, these simply are and further must be the UNIVERSAL parts of us, also.
As these COLLECTIVE SYSTEMS obviously appear responsible for the ability of life to surpass its achieved structuring (logic) limits, it appears that WE (as the life) theoretically and practically do have a real option to become logically aligned with whatever lays beyond our BIOSPHERE & beyond our INDIVIDUAL TIME frames, ultimately up there in COSMOS — or out there in SPACE, which we are still so desperately trying to reach and explore through utilisation of our physical world, with rockets, further burning the only atmosphere we seem to have (through structures formed & managed much more often by the single INDIVIDUAL).
Chapter 7 — Issues with INDIVIDUAL LOGIC in conduction of STRUCTURING of any COLLECTIVE
INDIVIDUALISM (or more accurately defined SYSTEM OF INDIVIDUALS) & INDIVIDUALS that claim that such a system seems to be the only way of structuring of the COLLECTIVE, SEEM TO BE directly LEADING the further DESTRUCTION OF THE UNDERSTANDING between INDIVIDUALS and therefore, of the COLLECTIVE itself and, even of the natural linkage between individuals (especially on a larger scale nowadays, with FACEBOOK & other tools) so the COLLECTIVES are rapidly experiencing various forms of DEGRADATION. It also seemingly appears as if the DEGRADATION of the COLLECTIVE is usually first shown by a PROGRESSION: subtle < intense tendency of our societies to be moving away from any larger STRUCTURES, GROUPS, UNIONS & INSTITUTIONS to a variety of TRIBALISM & TRIBAL or TRIBE A LIKE BEHAVIOR & STRUCTURINGS (Banking Cartel, Political Cartel, Institutional Cartels etc), that pretty much all our current day societies are seemingly heavily experiencing for more than a while now, but just to be clear, this story of mine appears of not really being a story about our classes; well, at least NOT in that MARXIST view & sense or (more recently) in that social warrior form of it… as I never and in any point wanted to implicate limiting of anyone’s freedom as a solution, this rather appears as a matter of culture, good manners & civilised behaviour of oneself; though seemingly appearing that these INDIVIDUALS seem to be directly resulting with limiting freedom of, well, all of us.
It seems important to point out that many of these “developments”, combined with our achieved technologies result in some quite intense percentage of probability of us actually deriving OUR OWN EXTINCTION. Furthermore, as WE are the only rulers of our biosphere, this highly likely indicate also, the death of all other creatures currently coexisting with us in our only BIOSPHERE.
This matter is appearing as if we are following the madman logic or some logic discrepancy, yet, it seems to be the only logic we use for a while now and still now, or better said nowadays. And that’s… What’s that!?
I tried, very hard to think about how these issues in perpetual cancer alike structural developments started occurring and as it seemed that intensification of such seems occurred in our recent history, and as I personally experienced amplification or large structural changes making me further now appearing as a conspiracy theorist of a sort, but when discussing of this matter, but I just have to point out a few historical issues with this Individual to the Collective conspiracy seemingly appearing as something, well, successfully implemented or successfully conspired:
- Seems as if something REALLY happened during the time of Nazi Germany & the second world war (on a global scale) with the rulers of the Globalists/Jews/Khazars/Illuminati or Whatever we call `em AND the Hitler association (that’s judging by all other developments seems done a great thing to Israel & well, Jews at the end) which kept the good old alchemy & other esoteric pieces of knowledge (astrology, metaphysics, symbolism etc) still here & further developed, but totally not shared to anyone else on our planet.
- Israel was founded in 1948, by this “new” Germany, and as a consequence of the Holocaust (which actually (in the real-life data) mainly tried to eradicate collectivists and Marxism oriented people) and same applies as well to the most of the newly formed European & the American & the Asian & ALL OTHER (as Germans say) POST-WESTPHALIAN states. *referring to North-Rhine-Westphalia, or better said and easier understood, to POST-WEST-GERMANY states. Indicating that our core structures and all our Institutions were rearranged and got new add-ons & structures back then (which all for some reason seem to be very nicely correlated with our cancer rates, as well).
- All of which (in all recorded cases) Collectivist or Collective oriented (Communist) nations & states were damaged or being broken fully either during that or during more than several other wars, and afterwards, via almost identical methods (of which the main one was the establishment of the dictatorship, by either an outsider (or outside set) INDIVIDUAL, or a non-virtuous or corrupt insider (again AN INDIVIDUAL), after which, entire systems (THE COLLECTIVES) were gradually or even instantly declared as defunct, or a non-functional systems & institutions even non-functional collectives (and even A BAD COLLECTIVES / LOWER RACES / SAVAGES / or SHITHOLES (AS TRUMP, an (again) FULL BLOWN INDIVIDUALIST and the open supporter of Israel, actually SAYS, very much out loud)).
NOTE: I don’t and didn’t express anything else but some COLLECTIVELY checkable information… and no, I personally do not have anything against any nation or any collective in any form, for that matter…
But, as I do seek for truthhere, and I would, therefore surely change any of my opinions if you`d factually proven me wrong. But to directly change my thinking you can do so, of course, through the utilisation of our COLLECTIVELY DERIVED or collectively shared, and therefore, through just speaking, well, UNIVERSALLY.
Chapter 8—Approximation differing of an Individual and of a Collective in Scientific Researching — Unification of the Science
SCIENCES in today’s form, are always being developed at the INDIVIDUAL LEVEL, since they almost always carry on further into DISSECTING of the UNIVERSAL data and in exploring the SHORTER TIME DISCREPANCIES or smaller chunks (certainly smaller than us) of the universal data; so it`s even better to be said & defined that all these usually do a ZOOM IN thing, into SMALLER & further SMALLER section or a PART of the UNIVERSAL DATA. Making our sciences further clustered into smaller and certainly smaller pieces, not-unified-at-all and with more (& more) divisions of the data (of our UNIVERSE), and I hope we all can agree that that’s exactly, what’s going on with this matter, for more than a while now…
We seem to have a naturally existing indication that all our Individual sciences tend to further zoom into everything that they are exploring… And we can try to understand that maybe it happened for a good reason.
That approach seems to be a FULLY BENEFICIAL STANDPOINT FOR UNDERSTANDING ANY EQUAL (LIKE US) or ANY SMALLER (THAN US) SYSTEM or chunk of our Universal Data… So, MAINLY BECAUSE of our INDIVIDUALISTIC APPROACH, WE DISCOVERED HOW TO PUT other SMALLER and SMALLER SYSTEMS TO OUR OWN CONTROL (OUR ANIMALS, PLANTS, CELLS, MOLECULES, ATOMS, ETC.) AND, HOW TO FIGHT VARIOUS ILLNESSES SUCH AS VIRUSES & BACTERIA.
I will try to visually explain the only way I`m able to see this complex matter.
In our Biosphere, all our animals, plants, and eventually, our micro world, bacterias, viruses, molecules, atoms, electrons, protons, leptons, quarks or whatever the last categorization is named, is naturally just the part of what`s less complex than us! And the data indicated that we can`t really use that approach for what seems to be more complex than us.
< ZOOMING OUT < UNITY < WE MADE < WE ACHIEVED < COLLECTIVELY ACHIEVED < BOOKS < LANGUAGES < SYMBOLS < MYTHS < SHARED KNOWLEDGE < SPECIES SURVIVAL< EVOLUTION < COLLECTIVE UNCONSCIOUS < GUESTURES < MALE TO FEMALE SEX
<MACRO ◎ BIOSPHERE >
Humans, Animals, Plants etc.
< BIOSPHERE ◎MICRO>
LIMITED PHYSICAL WORLD >
NOT UNDERSTANDING OF ANYTHING LARGER THAN ITSELF > SELFIE > MIRROR > UNDERSTANDING SAME & LESS COMPLEX SYSTEMS > LEARNED TO HANDLE THE ANIMALS > ZOOMING GLASS > BACTERIA > MEDICINE > MOLECULE > ATOM >HIGGS BOSON > ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT > TRANSISTOR > ZOOMING IN >
Chapter 9 — OUR INABILITY of 1. GETTING ANYTHING ABOVE THE LOW EARTH ORBIT 2. DOING ANY REAL-LIFE SUCCESSFUL SPACE TRAVEL (outside of Hollywood)
As an individual which actually has some knowledge about the constellations and the sky & our fixed stars, I do have a more than a big issue with believing NASA & SpaceX & ESA, and in accepting of any fact that these organizations declare as such. And instead of speaking of history of these organisations & my own or someone else’s conspiracies, or in their methods for development of their technologies, we could start by JUST BEING UNIVERSAL and so from the latest few showcases of ongoing discrepancies: with Elon Musk, Richard Branson and many other INDIVIDUALS that started their companies to make rockets to send people wherever, we`ve proven to the entire world, silently though, that we as human beings cannot leave even a very low earth orbit or else we would be probably nowadays be watching on YOUTUBE: “Richard Branson, Keith Richards & Elon Musk, drinking their whiskey cocaine on their whores of cosmos.” But, since we are not doing currently that, therefore we simply must understand & finally UNIVERSALLY conclude that WE SURELY HAVENT BEEN TO THE MOON, EVER, as well, as more than a few more things more. Also, with Russian digging of the 14 KM hole, we have (also silently) proven to the world that we can’t go much downwards, as well…
So a “NEW” NOWHERE WRITTEN FACT is stating that WE CAN NOT GET ABOVE NOR BELLOW of LEVEL of OUR BIOSPHERE (at all).
#no #space #spacetravel #moonhoax
Imagine (in the lack of better words)this global corporate cancer, still burning our only atmosphere; and doing that since Hitlers time and still, yet, with Hitler’s developed technologies (VonBrauns rockets), if I might add…?
Chapter 10 — How were these organised structures & collectives (managed by 1% of their Individuals) got an option to be Formed & Developed?
The explanation is simple & I`d try to form it UNIVERSALLY like:
Individuals that behaved quite orderly, which planned & organised themselves (and eventually others around them) logically, in a previously-non-organised or structured (or chaotic) sociological surrounding, have successfully developed, discovered, produced or created:
- (STRUCTURING or ORGANISATION METHODS of MATERIALS — MATERIAL GOODS) PROGRESSION: Tools, machinery & methods for organisation & utilisation of other, Less-complex systems (animals, plants, bacteria…).
- (STRUCTURING or ORGANISATION METHODS of LESS-COMPLEX-SYSTEMS) PROGRESSION: Food production — fruit & vegetable cultivation, animal farms & farming, agriculture & large-sized plant harvesting etc.
- (STRUCTURING or ORGANISATION METHODS of SAME-COMPLEX-SYSTEMS) PROGRESSION: Starting probably with the organisation of *their own environment & homes, *families, and further around forming *tribes & *groups, and further, larger collectives such as armies, unions and eventually institutions & other, more complex sociological structures…
- (STRUCTURING or ORGANISATION METHODS for interaction with MORE-COMPLEX-SYSTEMS) PROGRESSION: Employing healers — shamans — remedy creators in tribes, and further, structuring religions & religious institutions, philosophers, sciences, universities, experiments, and further, structuring Nasa, Large Hadron Collider, ESA, SpaceX, Virgin Galactic etc?
This appears to be the common sense, logical explanation of CREATION & of DEVELOPMENTS of various of our COLLECTIVE STRUCTURES (universally applicable to all our existing socio-political structures).
It appears that a significantly larger percentage of the INDIVIDUALS that are claiming that INDIVIDUALISM seems to be the only successful method in ORGANISATION of any possible COLLECTIVE, somehow (NATURALLY) do take quite of an active role in DETECTING & POINTING OUT any potentially manifested DIFFERENCE (in processing of anything) that they INDIVIDUALLY DETECTED, initially between THEM (in their INDIVIDUAL processing of anything) and OTHER INDIVIDUALS (in their processing of anything).
It`s quite an important that all these PROCESSES that do further DIVIDING, DIFFERENTIATING and CATEGORISING of our INDIVIDUALS by their manifested DIFFERENCES (in their processing of anything) would ultimately if developed fully, as the end result have the DESTRUCTION of RELATIONSHIPS, because, in order for UNDERSTANDING to occur in the first place, you must SHARE some SIMILARITIES with the other side. So, further DIVISION & AMPLIFICATION of the DIFFERENCES is resulting in the DESTRUCTION of UNDERSTANDING between INDIVIDUALS and their (nowadays, even of NATURAL) RELATIONSHIPS & CONNECTIONS that can exist & be formed between these. This process of DIFFERENTIATION is (NATURALLY) DIVIDING INDIVIDUALS that (NATURALLY) must be or act UNIFIED or UNITED, in order to FORM or STRUCTURE anything, larger than themselves and/or COLLECTIVELY.
Previously stated perfectly explains a lot of what is appearing to be our current state of our world, 70 years long USA leadership & further promotion of the INDIVIDUALISM, by ANY MEANS, through a variety of methods, but seemingly in ACADEMIA through quite intense propagandism of a sort of & through works like Ayn Rand’s “Atlas^ Shrugged×”, forced application of the Chicago Boys (Chicago School of Economics (Milton Friedman & others)). Appearing as directly involved with the destruction of COLLECTIVISTIVIST STATES & COMMUNISM and so, for its probable presumably particular reasons. But the real-life truth appears requiring our understanding of our collective memories, symbols, memes or better said, of our collective parts. Moreso, these further seem to be a quite crucial but a totally misunderstood part of us, to enter that realm we need to understand how to do it, so we can further, SCIENTIFICALLY research the subject.
UNIVERSALLY: Start would be trough researching the naturally occurred SYMBOLS & naturally occurred LOGIC; And through confirming it through the real-life data which means, yes, through STATISTICS & our SCIENCES.
The existing Universal, Mythological, Etymological, Psychological, Sociological, Structural, Religious & Astrological Symbols, their meanings & their combinatorics, seems to be showing something, actually quite RESEARCHABLE & with quite MEASURABLE information in it.
Chapter 11 — Research on the origins of symbols & myths — Science Only Research on the Celestial or Ephemeral Movements
Real-life Statistics on Mythological Claims of Ephemeral Influence.
If anyone just tried and researched the subject in the manner it required in the first place, (with an understanding of the influence of particular celestial, position, relation to the other, definitions, generalised stuff for the start) that we`d get up to roundabout 98.8% in CORRELATION with Particular Celestials, we just spoke of; All of which is roundabout at least 30x less abstract & more precise to test, than any of our current day and age Psychological & Sociological tests, which are going so easy as “statistically correlated & proven“.
HOW WEIRD IS THAT THERE’S NO INFORMATION OF A SINGLE SERIOUS, REAL-LIFE DATA DRIVEN & ASTRO-LOGICALLY CORRECT, PURELY STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CELESTIAL INFLUENCE. HOW COME? IF: SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH WOULD PRESUME THE STATEMENT OF THE CLAIMER IS RIGHT AND BY WHICHEVER METHOD STATISTICALLY EITHER CONFIRM OR OPPOSE IT, USING SOLELY THE REAL-LIFE DATA & DATA ANALYSIS. HOW COME WE NEVER DID THAT?
- And whoa, we’re back to our conspiracy theories for Hitler / Jews / Khazars / Illuminati / Queen / Vatican / and other secret-WHAT-EVERS…
Don`t take me wrong here; Some people actually conducted some research on the potential influence of the say, the Moon or a planet Mars, but ALL EXISTING material was done in a form which is MYTHOLOGICALLY, SYMBOLICALLY & ASTRO-LOGICALLY, IN THE BEGINNING, TOTALY FALSE & NOT-CORRECT & NOT-ALIGNED WITH what these bits of knowledge & those claims.
Is it so hard to try with the CORRECT METHOD:
- Gathering a smaller team of people which claim they understand Etymology, Symbology, Astrology, Mythology, Astronomy, Physics & Ephemeral data (for the start).
- Asking them to point where the influence shall be detected with the most strength and with as much as the description or information quality.
- AFTERWARDS STATISTICALLY & THROUGH THE REAL LIFE DATA ANALYSIS CONDUCT THE ACTUAL RESEARCH OF THE EXISTENCE OF CLAIMED CORRELATION. Only in that form, this would be: “A both scientifically and astrologically correct way & approach to either prove it or disclaim it.”
Let us UPDATE ROUNDABOUT 20 000 YEARS of COLLECTIVE KNOWLEDGE & theories to check if they EXIST IN THE REAL-LIFE DATA?
An entire universe of things is existing in there, but also in all our religions and old beliefs, and is being “stored” there, for a very good reason, by all our previous thinkers. The Planets, The Fixed Stars, The Houses, The Signs, The Moons, The Asteroids & Their Relationships, Their Movement & So Much More.
The real problem with this matter is in the actual interpretation & the translated sentences, since, they actually translate into an amazingly more than VERY PRECISE & VERY PARTICULAR DEFINITIONS of any given moments or chunks of our times. APPLICABLE TO ONE INDIVIDUAL ONLY, yet UNIVERSAL & APPLICABLE TO COLLECTIVES, NEVERTHELESS.
100% SCIENCE RESEARCH ON THE ORIGINS OF ASTROLOGY
Astro Meta-Physics Foundation is an OPEN-SOURCE, NON-PROFITABLE ORGANIZATION deriving a truthful & scientifically measurable utilisation method of our ephemeral progressing & seemingly to all of our collective subjects such like mythological, symbolic, astrological and astrologically oriented knowledge, which is here actually used for only one thing; To further Guide or do the “fine-tuning” of STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, HEURISTICS, MACHINE LEARNING & NEURAL NETWORKS and of better said, purely SCIENTIFIC TOOLS. Guiding mainly statistical analysis & statistical analysis tools & other data sorting mechanism to a probable firmer alignment to the data appearing in our UNIVERSAL DATA, as FREE and OPEN-SOURCED, GLOBALLY.